Lds if I Get Remarried in the Temple Do My Children Have to Be Sealed to Me Again

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Question

Granddaddy,

In the example of several marriages and children of more than i marriage…who are the children sealed to? Exercise they go with the mother?

Judy

Reply

Dear Judy,

You initially asked a simple, direct question, which deserves a simple, direct reply. Unfortunately, it's a chip more than complicated than what you appear to think, so it's going to have me more than just a unmarried judgement to respond you. Merely I retrieve three should be enough. I'll give examples, likewise.

Children are non sealed to their mother or their father individually. Rather, they are sealed to theirparents equally a couple. That is to say, children are sealedwithin the bonds of their parents' marital covenant.

Then here are some examples (which I accept made up and which are not based on any specific individuals):

ALAN AND BETH

Alan and Beth go married by a justice of the peace. Beth gives birth to Charlie, butCharlie is not sealed to his parents. He can't be; his parents have no eternal covenant inside which he might have been built-in.

After, Alan and Beth kneel beyond the temple altar from each other and are sealed in eternal marriage. In the following years, Beth then gives birth to Danielle, Esther, and Fred. The iii younger children are all sealed to Alan and Beth, because they all wereborn in the covenant of Alan and Beth's eternal union sealing. Note that their oldest son Charlie is stillnon sealed to his parents; he was not born within their covenant, because they had non made that covenant at the time he was born.

Alan and Beth bring Charlie to the temple and again kneel beyond the altar from each other. They join hands with each other and with Charlie, who is then sealed to themevery bit if he had been built-in in their covenant. At this bespeak, Charlie is sealed to his parents, exactly as if he had been born in their covenant as his siblings were. (In reality, babe Charlie would almost certainly have been sealed to his parents at the time they were sealed in marriage to each other, not years afterward after his siblings had been built-in. But hey, it's an illustrative example.)

A few years later, Beth and Alan make up one's mind to prefer little Giselle. At this indicate, Giselle is not sealed to Beth or Alan (or anyone else). But as with Charlie, Alan and Beth take Giselle to the temple, where she is sealed to them inside their marital covenant. Now Giselle is sealed to her adoptive parents, exactly as if she had been born to them within their marital covenant.

THE SAGA OF MARIA

Now consider Henry and Ina. They marry in the temple and are sealed to each other as husband and wife. They welcome their first child, Julius, who of class is born in their covenant and thus sealed to them. Sadly, Henry dies of a tragic medical complication, leaving his widow and orphaned son.

A few years later, Ina marries Kevin, himself a Latter-twenty-four hour period Saint widower with a daughter, Lena. Lena was built-in inside her parents' marital covenant, and so is sealed to them and not within Ina'southward covenant. Ina and Kevin marry for time, just since each is already sealed to his or her first spouse, they are not sealed to each other. Their combined children, Julius and Lena, are each born in the covenant and, therefore, each sealed to their corresponding parents.

A twelvemonth subsequently, Kevin and Ina welcome their newborn girl Maria into their family unit. Merely Maria's parents, Kevin and Ina, are not sealed to each other. Each is sealed to a deceased spouse. And so is Maria born in the covenant? If so, to whom?

The answer is aye, Maria is born in the covenant. Maria's mother Ina is sealed to a human (Henry), and that sealing is intact. Therefore, since Maria'south female parent is actively sealed to a homo, Maria herself is born within her female parent's covenant. Maria has no need of being sealed to her parents; she is already built-in in the covenant.

CHILDREN ARE SEALED WITHIN THEIR PARENTS' ETERNAL MARITAL COVENANT

As I hope I've fabricated clear, children are not sealed to their mother and their father individually. Children are "sealed to their parents" in the sense that they are born within their parents' eternal marital covenant. For those children who are not actually born inside an eternal marital covenant—which is the case with the overwhelming majority of God'southward children who accept always lived upon the earth—such children (even as adults) can receive a temple ordinance which grants them full admission into the ranks of those so born, with access to all of the rights and blessings that those born in the covenant of an eternal marriage can receive. Indeed, God is no respecter of persons.

In the economy of God, it is the sealing status of thefemale parent that determines whether the kid is born in the covenant or non. God has divinely called and empowered women to be mothers, creators with God himself of human life, then information technology is the mother'southward status that determines the child's status.

You may wonder how this doctrine came most. My ain understanding is that this was an of import question in the early decades of Church history, when plural marriage was skillful among the Saints. There were men who felt that so long as they had been sealed toa woman, then all of their children byany other woman or women would be built-in within that covenant. The Church leaders made information technology articulate that such was not the instance. It was thefemale parent'due south sealing status, non the father's, that determined whether a child had been born in the covenant. A phrase I used to hear wasThe sealing follows the female parent; I believe this is the historical root of that maxim.

You CANNOT Be SEALED TO AN UNMARRIED PARENT

Many times in the past few decades, I have heard the plaintive cry of an single mother, lamenting, "Why can't my children be sealed but to me?" The question betrays a deep misunderstanding of what it means to exist sealed to a parent. As I take emphasized several times, a kid is non sealed to individual parents. The sealing betwixt parent and child exists as a outcome of the sealing between hubby and wife. I am sealed to my own male parent and mother considering my male parent and mother were sealed to each other. I was born inside that marital covenant of sealing between my parents; thus I was born in the covenant. It is non possible to be born or sealed within a marital covenant involving only i parent, considering no such covenant exists. The marital covenant always, in all cases and without exception, involves one man and one women existence made ane mankind earlier God. If you keep this in mind, I think other questions about sealing volition get clear.

FINALLY…

To whom can/should you and your children be sealed? That'southward not a question I tin answer. If you are worthy, yous may be sealed to whatsoever worthy man who agrees to be sealed to yous. This may exist something you lot want to discuss with a trusted friend or counselor, such as your Relief Society president, ministering sister, or ministering companion. I wish you lot success in your journey.

Gramps

simstheming.blogspot.com

Source: https://askgramps.org/children-sealed-several-marriages/

0 Response to "Lds if I Get Remarried in the Temple Do My Children Have to Be Sealed to Me Again"

Post a Comment

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel